ERRONEOUS PREDICTION OF RESULTS BY APACHE -II - ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTION ERRORS OF DEATH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

Citation
R. Abizanda et al., ERRONEOUS PREDICTION OF RESULTS BY APACHE -II - ANALYSIS OF THE PREDICTION ERRORS OF DEATH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS, Medicina Clinica, 102(14), 1994, pp. 527-531
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00257753
Volume
102
Issue
14
Year of publication
1994
Pages
527 - 531
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-7753(1994)102:14<527:EPORBA>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the prognosis of critically ill patients by the APACHE II method is common in intensive care units (ICU). The aim of the present was to analyze the possible factors associated to e rrors in prediction. METHODS: A prospective study of 564 consecutive a dmissions in a department of intensive medical care was carried out. P rediction errors were studied by the calculation of the probability of death established after the first 24 hours of admission by means of A PACHE II. The factors analyzed in relation to the prediction errors we re: the diagnosis or cause of admission to the ICU, the length of the stay in the ICU, the time until possible death, the possible relation of the death with the cause of admission and the treatment given to th e patients during the first 24 hours Statistical analysis was performe d with the SPSS software package with significance being determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Mortality was of 20.6% (116 cases) with three cut off points being chosen for probability of death (50, 70, and 90%). Ac curacy of precision was 83.5%, 82.8% and 80.1%. There were 64 false su rvivors (mortality lower than 50%, 13.25%-64/483) and 29 false deaths (survival greater than 50%, 35.8%-29/81). Upon analysis of the cause o f admission of these patients in whom there were prediction errors it was found that there were no differences among the false survivors and the false deaths. Significant differences were only detected upon com parison of the false survivors with the verified survivors, however th ese disappeared when the 136 cases admitted due to myocardial infarcti on were excluded. Neither did the lenght of stay in the ICU demonstrat e any significant difference except among the verified and false death s in that the stay was longer in the latter. CONCLUSIONS: The factors analyzed did not demonstrate that they may influence or be associated with errors in prediction of the prognosis of patients admitted to an intensive care unit, with these errors probably being due to errors in the system used.