Ch. Bishop et Aj. Thorpe, FRONTAL WAVE STABILITY DURING MOIST DEFORMATION FRONTOGENESIS .2. THESUPPRESSION OF NONLINEAR-WAVE DEVELOPMENT, Journal of the atmospheric sciences, 51(6), 1994, pp. 874-888
In this paper, the role of horizontal deformation and the associated f
rontogenetic ageostrophic circulation in suppressing the development o
f nonlinear waves is assessed. Unless linear barotropic frontal waves
can become nonlinear, the associated horizontal transports of momentum
will not be sufficient to halt frontogenesis or to create nonlinear m
ixing processes such as vortex roll-up. The analysis of Dritschel et a
l. suggests that such nonlinear phenomena will not occur if the wave s
lope remains small. For the linear model described in Part I, a simple
relationship between optimal wave slope amplification over a specifie
d time period and the amplification of an initially isolated edge wave
is found. Using this relationship, the mechanisms by which strain aff
ects the dependence of optimal wave slope amplification on wavelength
and the time of entry of disturbances to the front are investigated. I
t is found that waves entering the frontal zone when it is intense can
experience greater steepening than those appearing earlier in the dev
elopment of the front. The most rapidly growing waves enter the front
with a wavelength about three times the width of the front. As the fro
nt collapses, the ratio of wavelength to frontal width rapidly increas
es. For strain rates greater than 0.6 x 10(-5) s-1, the model predicts
that wave slope amplification greater than a factor of e is impossibl
e. The variation of optimal growth with wavenumber and the time of ent
ry of disturbances to the front is explained using diagnostics based o
n a mathematical model of Bretherton's qualitative description of wave
growth in terms of the interaction of counterpropagating edge waves.
These diagnostics yield a simple formula for the frontogenesis rate re
quired to completely eliminate wave steepening. For the front consider
ed in Part I, the formula predicts that no amplification is possible f
or strain rates greater than one-quarter of the Coriolis parameter. Di
agnostics of this sort may aid attempts to predict, from the large-sca
le forcing, the minimum attainable cross-frontal scale of a front.