PURPOSE: To evaluate carotid artery volume-flow measurements with time
-domain-processing ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volume
-flow measurements were obtained in the carotid arteries of nine swine
with time-domain-processing US. Four swine were prepared with a model
of an arteriovenous shunt mow through the carotid artery was varied b
y means of a number of physiologic and pharmacologic interventions. Th
e reference standard for volume flow consisted of measurements with tr
ansit-time US flowmetry. At a limited number of measurement points, th
is reference standard was validated against true volume flow measured
with timed collection. RESULTS: For now rates less than 500 mL/min, a
linear correlation existed between measurements with time-domain proce
ssing and the US flow meter (r(2) = .96, P < .001, slope = 1.117). Val
ues above 500 mL/min were less well correlated with the reference stan
dard. True flow was underestimated with both methods, less so with tim
e-domain processing than with US flowmetry (underestimation, 10% versu
s 21%). Measurements were significantly less reproducible with time-do
main processing than with US flowmetry (P < .001). Interobserver varia
bility was negligible. CONCLUSION: Because of operator errors, measure
ments with time-domain processing should be repeated at least three ti
mes to ensure accuracy and may be inaccurate in flow rates over 500 mL
/min.