During his lifetime William James's complex ideas about emotion were o
versimplified to the point of caricature, and for the next half centur
y scientific research on emotion was driven by the oversimplified vers
ion-by the idea that emotions are merely the sensation of bodily chang
es. In fact, the interpretation of the stimulus was an essential featu
re of James's ideas, but one that seemed so obvious that it did not re
quire explanation. Three damaging scientific consequences of the misch
aracterization of James's views were (a) the nearly exclusive focus on
bodily process, (b) the reification of emotions as entities rather th
an processes, and (c) the linear thinking produced by the concern with
the sequence of affect, interpretation, and bodily response.