A STEAM-AUGMENTED GAS-TURBINE WITH REHEAT COMBUSTOR FOR SURFACE SHIPS

Citation
Hb. Urbach et al., A STEAM-AUGMENTED GAS-TURBINE WITH REHEAT COMBUSTOR FOR SURFACE SHIPS, Naval engineers journal, 106(3), 1994, pp. 41-51
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Marine",Oceanografhy
Journal title
ISSN journal
00281425
Volume
106
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
41 - 51
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-1425(1994)106:3<41:ASGWRC>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The steam-augmented gas turbine (SAGT) concept has attracted attention because of its benign level of NO(x) emission, its increased fuel eff iciency, and significant, cost-effective increments of output power, p articularly, when moisture injection is increased to levels approachin g 50% of air flow. Such high levels of moisture consumption distinguis h the SAGT engine from commercial steam-injected gas turbines where st eam flow may be less than 15% of air flow. At the high 50% levels, the SAGT burner would operate near stoichiometric combustion ratios with specific powers exceeding 570 hp-sec/lb. In a previous study, an inter cooled, steam-augmented, gas-turbine concept was examined for its appl icability in the Navy's DDG-51 class ship environments, which achieves efficiencies approaching the Navy's intercooled regenerative (ICR) en gine, and an impressive compactness that arises from the high specific power of steam and low air consumption. A newer SAGT engine concept, described herein, dispenses with the intercooler, but adds a low-press ure reheat combustor. At the most efficient operating points, the effi ciency of this new reheat SAGT engine at 43% exceeds the efficiency of the ICR engine, while exhibiting the compactness of the previous SAGT concept. Tabular and graphical simulation data comparing the baseline engine, with the ICR and other engine simulations, show that the maxi mum efficiency of the new SAGT engine occurs at powers required for cr uising speeds. Since a DDG operates near cruise conditions for the maj ority of its mission time, a SAGT plant uses less fuel than the ICR pl ant. Moreover, since it eliminates the intercooler, developmental work on member elements, largely derivable from off-the-shelf components, is reduced. Even with conservative cost estimates, the SAGT plant is q uite competitive on a first-acquisition cost basis with the current ga s turbine in the fleet.