Cm. Ashton et al., THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN RESIDENTS WORK-ROUNDS STYLES AND THE PROCESS AND OUTCOME OF MEDICAL-CARE, Journal of general internal medicine, 9(4), 1994, pp. 208-212
Objective: To determine whether the manner in which residents conduct
work rounds is associated with the adequacy of their care processes an
d the outcomes of their patients. Methods: Two types of data were coll
ected: time and motion data for residents (n = 12) during work rounds,
and clinical and outcome data for the patients they cared for during
the observation period (n = 211). Five residents were classified as da
ta gatherers because they spent twice as much time gathering clinical
data about their patients as they spent engaging in other activities.
Three physicians blinded to the resident's identity rated the quality
of the care process and assessed the frequency of undesirable events o
ccurring during the stay and after discharge. Results: A data-gatherin
g style was associated with higher quality of care as judged by both p
rocess and outcomes. The data gatherers were more likely to comply wit
h the ''stability of medications before discharge'' criterion (86% of
the data gatherers' cases vs 73% of others', p = 0.07), and their pati
ents were less likely to have unanticipated problems, in that fewer re
quired calls from nurses (20% vs 37%, p < 0.01) and visits by on-call
housestaff (33% vs 50%, p = 0.01). The data gatherers' patients were l
ess likely to be readmitted within 30 days (14% vs 38%, p < 0.01). Con
clusions: A data-gathering work-rounds style is associated with better
process and outcome. Residency programs should provide formal instruc
tion to trainees in the conduct of work rounds.