Cn. Powers et al., FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY - PITFALLS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPINDLE-CELL LESIONS, Diagnostic cytopathology, 10(3), 1994, pp. 232-241
Seven cases of spindle-cell proliferations in which fine-needle aspira
tion biopsy (FNAB) did not correlate with subsequent histology are pre
sented. Three cases were considered low-grade sarcoma, one a dermatofi
brosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), one a spindle-cell tumor with malignanc
y not excluded, and one a rhabdomyosarcoma vs. a fibrosarcoma. Two of
the these three were histologically nodular fasciitis and one an infla
mmatory pseudotumor. Two cases were diagnosed cytologically as fibroma
tosis or nodular fasciitis (NF). One of these histologically was an in
tramuscular hemangioma, the other a DFSP. The last two cases were diag
nosed by FNAB as spindle-cell lesion, undetermined if benign or malign
ant, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). Histologically both of
these case were leiomyosarcoma. The cytologic features of each case, d
ifferential diagnosis, and potential pitfalls are discussed In the eva
luation of FNAB smears dominated by spindle cells, cellullarity, indiv
idual cells and cell patterns, and background stromal features coupled
with a precise clinical history may allow a narrow differential diagn
osis with a focus on whether the lesion is benign or malignant. Cautio
n is warranted in the exact classification of spindle-cell tumors from
FNAB as this may have a major impact on patient management. (C) 1994
Wiley-Liss, Inc.