R. Sreedhara et al., ANTIPLATETLET THERAPY IN GRAFT THROMBOSIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE,RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY, Kidney international, 45(5), 1994, pp. 1477-1483
Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access thrombosis remains a major cause of
morbidity, accounting for 17.4% of all HD patient hospital admissions
in 1986. We initiated this prospective, randomized, double-blind, plac
ebo-controlled, parallel group study to examine if dipyridamole and/or
aspirin decreased the rate of thrombosis of expanded polytetrafluoroe
thylene (ePTFE) grafts in HD patients. Two patient groups were studied
: Type I-with a new ePTFE graft; and Type II-with thrombectomy and/or
revision of a previously placed ePTFE graft. One hundred and seven pat
ients were followed for 18 months or until the first thrombotic episod
e. Actuarial analysis of Type I patients showed cumulative thrombosis
rates (mean +/- SEM) of 21 +/- 9% on dipyridamole alone, compared with
25 +/- 11% on dipyridamole and aspirin combination, 42 +/- 13% on pla
cebo, and 80 +/- 12% on aspirin alone. The relative risk of thrombosis
with dipyridamole was 0.35 (P = 0.02) and that for aspirin was 1.99 (
P = 0.18). In Type II patients, the rate of thrombosis was high in all
study drug and placebo groups (overall 78% thrombosis) and actuarial
analysis was not carried out because of the small number of patients e
nrolled. We conclude that dipyridamole is beneficial in patients with
new ePTFE grafts and that aspirin does not improve the risk of thrombo
sis in ePTFE grafts. Neither dipyridamole nor aspirin has any benefici
al effect in patients with prior thrombosis of ePTFE grafts.