ANTIPLATETLET THERAPY IN GRAFT THROMBOSIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE,RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY

Citation
R. Sreedhara et al., ANTIPLATETLET THERAPY IN GRAFT THROMBOSIS - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE,RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY, Kidney international, 45(5), 1994, pp. 1477-1483
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00852538
Volume
45
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1477 - 1483
Database
ISI
SICI code
0085-2538(1994)45:5<1477:ATIGT->2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Hemodialysis (HD) vascular access thrombosis remains a major cause of morbidity, accounting for 17.4% of all HD patient hospital admissions in 1986. We initiated this prospective, randomized, double-blind, plac ebo-controlled, parallel group study to examine if dipyridamole and/or aspirin decreased the rate of thrombosis of expanded polytetrafluoroe thylene (ePTFE) grafts in HD patients. Two patient groups were studied : Type I-with a new ePTFE graft; and Type II-with thrombectomy and/or revision of a previously placed ePTFE graft. One hundred and seven pat ients were followed for 18 months or until the first thrombotic episod e. Actuarial analysis of Type I patients showed cumulative thrombosis rates (mean +/- SEM) of 21 +/- 9% on dipyridamole alone, compared with 25 +/- 11% on dipyridamole and aspirin combination, 42 +/- 13% on pla cebo, and 80 +/- 12% on aspirin alone. The relative risk of thrombosis with dipyridamole was 0.35 (P = 0.02) and that for aspirin was 1.99 ( P = 0.18). In Type II patients, the rate of thrombosis was high in all study drug and placebo groups (overall 78% thrombosis) and actuarial analysis was not carried out because of the small number of patients e nrolled. We conclude that dipyridamole is beneficial in patients with new ePTFE grafts and that aspirin does not improve the risk of thrombo sis in ePTFE grafts. Neither dipyridamole nor aspirin has any benefici al effect in patients with prior thrombosis of ePTFE grafts.