Many ethical concerns raised by prenatal testing are based on the use
and effects of genetic information in nonclinical contexts. Correct or
incorrect beliefs about social uses of genetic information may limit
the voluntariness of informed consent to prenatal testing. A qualitati
ve study of persons predictively tested for Huntington's disease illus
trates how the social context, in this case the family history of bein
g at risk, affects the interpretation of the genetic information and a
lters relationships. This constitutes a risk of genetic testing. Prena
tal testing also requires ethical analysis based on careful understand
ing of how social attitudes and nonclinical uses affect voluntariness
and potential harm and benefits of testing. Investigators conducting r
esearch on prenatal tests share the responsibility to evaluate social
attitudes toward at-risk persons, nonclinical uses of genetic informat
ion, and the social benefits and harm of such uses.