Aj. Balmforth et al., COMPARATIVE PHARMACOLOGY OF RECOMBINANT RAT AT(1A), AT(1B) AND HUMAN AT(1) RECEPTORS EXPRESSED BY TRANSFECTED COS-M6 CELLS, British Journal of Pharmacology, 112(1), 1994, pp. 277-281
1 Currently available antagonists and agonists cannot distinguish betw
een angiotensin AT(1) receptor subtypes. 2 We synthesized a series of
compounds selected on the basis of having the most diverse structural
features with respect to iosartan (DuP753), the prototype non-peptide
AT(1) receptor antagonist. Using a radioligand-receptor binding assay
and membranes prepared from COS-M6 cells transfected with individual A
T(1) receptor subtypes, we determined whether any of these compounds c
ould distinguish between the receptor subtypes. 3 The diversity of the
structural features of this series of compounds was reflected by the
wide range of affinities (pIC(50) values) displayed towards competing
with I-125-Sar(1)Ile(8) angiotensin II for binding to the AT(1) rece
ptors. 4 Direct comparisons of the pIC(50) values of individual compou
nds for rat AT(1A), AT(1B) and human AT(1) receptors revealed only min
or differences. 5 It is concluded that compounds based structurally on
losartan are unlikely to distinguish between these receptors.