D. Clogg et al., SHORT-COURSE THERAPY FOR TUBERCULOSIS IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 150(8), 1994, pp. 1233-1239
Objective: To improve efficacy of and compliance with therapy for tube
rculosis in children. Options: Short-course (6-month) multi-drug thera
py, either nonsupervised or directly supervised, versus long-course (m
ore than 6-month) multi-drug therapy. Outcomes: Success (more than 90%
of cases cured without relapse or serious side effects), development
of drug resistance and compliance with treatment. Evidence: Review of
published reports of efficacy trials of tuberculosis therapy in childr
en, side effects and compliance studies; consensus of expert opinion.
Values: Values were assigned to the evidence by the Infectious Disease
and Immunization Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society through
review of the data and consensus. Benefits, harms and costs: Improved
efficacy and compliance with short-course protocols should lower the
rate of treatment failure among children in Canada and the cost of tub
erculosis care. Recommendations: A short-course (6-month) protocol of
four drugs for the first 2 months and two drugs for the subsequent 4 m
onths is recommended to treat pulmonary tuberculosis dr extrapulmonary
disease causing lymphadenopathy. Tuberculous meningitis, disease invo
lving bones and joints and tuberculosis with HIV infection require lon
ger courses of treatment. Asymptomatic tuberculosis should be treated
with daily doses of isoniazid for 9 months. Intermittent directly obse
rved therapy is recommended if compliance cannot be ensured. Routine l
iver function testing is not recommended for prepubescent children lak
ing isoniazid, but monthly assessment for clinical symptoms and period
ic liver function evaluation is advised in adolescent women, especiall
y post partum. Validation: This report was reviewed by the directors o
f the Canadian Paediatric Society, the Hepatitis and Special Pathogens
Division of the Laboratory Centre for Disease Control and the Canadia
n Thoracic Society. The recommendations are similar to those of the Am
erican Academy of Pediatrics. Sponsor: The recommendations were develo
ped and endorsed by the Infectious Disease and Immunization Committee
of the Canadian Paediatric Society.