The bioenergetics of eight captive Common Barn-Owls (Tyto alba alba) a
cclimated at 5-degrees-C were studied during the restoration of a 30%
reduction in body mass following a period of total food deprivation. T
he eight-day period during which body mass was restored (Refeeding I)
was compared with a five-day prefasting period (Feeding), correspondin
g to steady body mass and a six-day period (Refeeding II) of stabiliza
tion at a new steady state. Food was given ad libitum throughout the f
eeding periods. During Refeeding 1, the rate of increase in body mass
(13.9 +/- SD of 1.0 g/24 h in females and 9.2 +/- 0.8 g/24 h in males)
was close to the maximum value for growth of captive or wild owlets.
It was achieved by a 1.63-fold increase in gross energy intake and dai
ly metabolized energy, respectively, of 370 +/- 42 and 275 +/- 31 kJ/d
during Feeding. In contrast to the clear increase in food assimilatio
n efficiency observed in other species during refeeding, the high rate
of energy intake and body mass restoration in the Common Barn-Owl was
associated with only a slight increase in assimilation efficiencies:
52.0 +/- 2.2% versus 49.1 +/- 1.0% during Feeding for dry mass; and 75
.5 +/- 1.1% versus 74.1 +/- 0.6% for energy. This slight increase coul
d only be attributed to a reduction of the energy lost in pellet produ
ction (i.e. to a higher effectiveness in gastric digestion). The energ
etic cost of daily change in body mass was estimated in both sexes and
both feeding periods, and appeared to be constant (10.8 +/- 1.1 kJ/g
fresh body mass). Using this value, the part of the daily metabolized
energy invested in the existence metabolism was calculated. After four
days of refeeding, existence metabolism paradoxically appeared simila
r or even higher than before fasting, while the body mass was still lo
wer than the initial value. Thus, in contrast to the laboratory rat (R
attus norvegicus) or humans, the Common Barn-Owl is unable to enhance
restoration of body reserves by minimizing existence requirements when
refed ad libitum after a period of starvation. This might be partly d
ue to the maintenance of a high locomotor activity throughout starvati
on and refeeding.