WINTER STARVATION IN CAPTIVE COMMON BARN-OWLS - BIOENERGETICS DURING REFEEDING

Citation
Y. Handrich et al., WINTER STARVATION IN CAPTIVE COMMON BARN-OWLS - BIOENERGETICS DURING REFEEDING, The Auk, 110(3), 1993, pp. 470-480
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Ornithology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00048038
Volume
110
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
470 - 480
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8038(1993)110:3<470:WSICCB>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
The bioenergetics of eight captive Common Barn-Owls (Tyto alba alba) a cclimated at 5-degrees-C were studied during the restoration of a 30% reduction in body mass following a period of total food deprivation. T he eight-day period during which body mass was restored (Refeeding I) was compared with a five-day prefasting period (Feeding), correspondin g to steady body mass and a six-day period (Refeeding II) of stabiliza tion at a new steady state. Food was given ad libitum throughout the f eeding periods. During Refeeding 1, the rate of increase in body mass (13.9 +/- SD of 1.0 g/24 h in females and 9.2 +/- 0.8 g/24 h in males) was close to the maximum value for growth of captive or wild owlets. It was achieved by a 1.63-fold increase in gross energy intake and dai ly metabolized energy, respectively, of 370 +/- 42 and 275 +/- 31 kJ/d during Feeding. In contrast to the clear increase in food assimilatio n efficiency observed in other species during refeeding, the high rate of energy intake and body mass restoration in the Common Barn-Owl was associated with only a slight increase in assimilation efficiencies: 52.0 +/- 2.2% versus 49.1 +/- 1.0% during Feeding for dry mass; and 75 .5 +/- 1.1% versus 74.1 +/- 0.6% for energy. This slight increase coul d only be attributed to a reduction of the energy lost in pellet produ ction (i.e. to a higher effectiveness in gastric digestion). The energ etic cost of daily change in body mass was estimated in both sexes and both feeding periods, and appeared to be constant (10.8 +/- 1.1 kJ/g fresh body mass). Using this value, the part of the daily metabolized energy invested in the existence metabolism was calculated. After four days of refeeding, existence metabolism paradoxically appeared simila r or even higher than before fasting, while the body mass was still lo wer than the initial value. Thus, in contrast to the laboratory rat (R attus norvegicus) or humans, the Common Barn-Owl is unable to enhance restoration of body reserves by minimizing existence requirements when refed ad libitum after a period of starvation. This might be partly d ue to the maintenance of a high locomotor activity throughout starvati on and refeeding.