Objective: To characterize patients calling plaintiff attorneys' offic
es and claiming to have suffered injury caused by medical negligence.
Design: Telephone interviews with an inception cohort of callers to la
w firms with malpractice complaints before the callers talk to attorne
ys. Setting: Six law offices in five states. Participants: 502 of 730
callers over 10 randomly selected days in 1991. Measurements: Demograp
hics of potential plaintiffs, types of health care providers named by
callers, factors prompting calls, economic and noneconomic motivations
for claims, and disposition of claims. Results: An average of 12 call
s per office per day were received by law firms concerning malpractice
complaints. Many factors affected patients' decisions to call: poor r
elationships with providers before an injury (53%); television adverti
sing by law firms (73%); explicit recommendations by health care provi
ders to seek legal counsel (27%); impressions of not being kept inform
ed or appropriately referred by providers; and financial concerns (for
example, 36% with earned income and outstanding medical bills had bil
ls equaling or exceeding 50% of their annual income, 33% were unemploy
ed, and 31% lacked health insurance). One in 30 calls led to the filin
g of a lawsuit. Conclusions: Calls to plaintiff law firms by patients
are common, are motivated by diverse factors, represent dissatisfactio
n with modern health care, and infrequently lead to lawsuits.