La. Goonewardene et al., COMPARISON OF GROWTH AND FEED-EFFICIENCY OF STEERS FED BARLEY AND TRITICALE DIETS, Canadian journal of animal science, 74(1), 1994, pp. 159-161
Steers fed triticale adapted to the diet more slowly than those fed ba
rley, resulting in reduced overall feed intake (9.4 vs. 10.5 kg d-1, P
= 0.08) and average daily gain (ADG) (1.3 vs. 1.5 kg d-1, P = 0.08).
No difference was detected in feed:gain ratio (7.1 vs. 6.8, P = 0.65).
The reduced ADG in the triticale-fed steers may be due to reduced fee
d intake and the longer time required to adapt.