Ca. Buneo et al., MUSCLE ACTIVATION PATTERNS FOR REACHING - THE REPRESENTATION OF DISTANCE AND TIME, Journal of neurophysiology, 71(4), 1994, pp. 1546-1558
The timing and intensity of phasic muscle activation were related to t
he distance of reaching movements of the human arm. We dissociated pha
sic components of muscle activation from complete muscle activation wa
veforms by subtracting waveforms obtained during very slow movements.
We recorded electromyographic (EMG) activity from elbow and/or shoulde
r muscles as standing subjects reached forward and upward to targets a
t four distances. Accuracy was deemphasized and no terminal correction
s were allowed. In the first part of the experiment subjects were aske
d to move at their preferred speed. In the second part of the experime
nt they were asked to move using a range of speeds. In the first part
of the experiment subjects moved faster to more distant targets but th
ey also increased movement time as a nearly linear function of target
distance. The slope of this function was very similar across subjects.
The phasic EMG waveforms for different distances appeared to be simil
ar in shape but of variable duration. EMG time base was quantified usi
ng a correlation technique that identified the time base scale factor
that best superimposed a given trace with a template. This technique r
evealed that the slope of the relation between EMG time base and targe
t distance was not the same for all muscles. In the second part of the
experiment, where subjects moved to each target at a range of specifi
ed speeds, time base scaling was again significantly different for dif
ferent muscles. The scaling differed most dramatically between anterio
r deltoid and medial head of triceps. EMG intensity was more strongly
related to movement time than to distance. We quantified the correspon
dence of distance and movement time to phasic EMG intensity using a mu
ltiple regression analysis of all distances and speeds, assuming a pow
er relation. Distance exponents were positive and movement time expone
nts were larger and negative. This implies that movement time is more
important than distance in its relation to EMG intensity.