There is a growing body of evidence that people's choices between risk
y and riskless options depend on the framing of the problem and the co
ntext of choice, contrary to the assumptions of description invariance
and context independence that underlie rational decision theories. Th
is article reviews these phenomena and discusses their implications. T
he first part discusses the evidence for reference dependence and intr
oduces the principle of loss aversion for both certain and uncertain c
hoice. The second part discusses context effects in choice, and introd
uces the principle of tradeoff contrast. Finally, we contrast the clas
sical theory of choice that is based on the standard assumption of rat
ionality with a constructive approach suggested by psychological resea
rch.