Ed. Engelstein et al., LIMITATIONS OF ADENOSINE IN ASSESSING THE EFFICACY OF RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ACCESSORY PATHWAYS, The American journal of cardiology, 73(11), 1994, pp. 774-779
Adenosine has been shown to reliably confirm the success of accessory
pathway catheter ablation by producing transient atrioventricular (AV)
block during atrial and ventricular pacing. This is due to the insens
itivity of accessory pathway conduction to adenosine (with the rare ex
ception of accessory pathways with decremental conduction properties).
However, 4 of 204 consecutive patients who underwent successful acces
sory pathway ablation (as shown by adenosine-induced transient AV bloc
k) had recurrent AV reciprocating tachycardia involving a second, prev
iously nonmanifest accessory pathway. In each case, the second accesso
ry pathway was localized to a site disparate from the original pathway
. No pathway showed decremental anterograde or retrograde conduction p
roperties. In 2 patients, adenosine initially did not show the presenc
e of the second concealed accessory pathway, because the refractory pe
riod of the accessory pathway was longer than the pacing cycle length
used to assess ventriculoatrial conduction. Only when the refractory p
eriod of this second accessory pathway was shortened by infusion of is
oproterenol did adenosine reveal the presence of the pathway during fo
llow-up electrophysiologic study. In another patient, a nondecremental
accessory pathway was shown to be sensitive to adenosine. In the rema
ining patient, the second accessory pathway may have been transiently
injured during the initial study, thereby simulating adenosine sensiti
vity. Therefore, it is concluded that (1) adenosine is a highly, but n
ot completely, effective method for immediately assessing the efficacy
of accessory pathway catheter ablation; (2) concomitant infusion of i
soproterenol during adenosine administration is necessary to recognize
the presence of accessory pathways with prolonged refractory periods;
and (3) assessment of the presence of accessory pathway conduction wi
th adenosine after ablation should preferably be performed at the long
est possible, paced cycle length.