Background: Most intellectual and cognitive assessment of pilots is do
ne with locally developed assessment devices. The United States Air Fo
rce currently uses the recently developed CogScreen (Aeromedical Editi
on) to assess these areas. Hypotheses: There will be differences on th
e CogScreen across USAF student pilot candidates and commercial pilots
. Methods: This paper presents the test scores of 512 USAF pilot train
ing candidates who were tested with this commercially available, ''off
-the-shelf'' product. Comparison data was abstracted from the test man
ual on commercial pilots. Results: Data from the new CogScreen (Aerome
dical Edition) is provided and shows consistent differences between pi
lot training candidates and commercial pilots across reaction time, ac
curacy, throughput, and process measures. Discussion: The new CogScree
n appears to be an appropriate device for the assessment of pilot cand
idates, student pilots, and pilots.