Skalski (1992, Biometrics 48, 877-882) assumed a constant retaining pr
obability p for all experimental units and found that the traditional
ad hoc procedure of escalating sample size by the multiplicative facto
r lip tends to underestimate the required sample size when p is small.
Because this retaining probability p often depends on characteristics
of different experimental units, however, p may vary from one unit to
another. In this report, we have allowed p to vary among different ex
perimental units. We have noted that when the retaining probability p
has a small mean but a large variance, the underestimation of the requ
ired sample size for a desired precision by use of the traditional adj
usted sample size formula can be even more serious than that demonstra
ted by Skalski.