Rm. Odell et al., USE OF PULSE OXIMETRY TO MONITOR VENOUS SATURATION DURING EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE-SUPPORT, Critical care medicine, 22(4), 1994, pp. 626-632
Objective: To assess the ability of two different pulse oximeters to d
isplay continuous venous oxygen saturation through an extracorporeal b
ypass circuit with a degree of accuracy comparable to direct in-line o
ximetry. Design: Prospective, comparison study of pulse oximeters (tes
t oximeter 1 or test oximeter 2) and an in-line oximeter (test oximete
r 3). Setting: A tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit. Patients:
Sixty-five consecutive neonates with severe cardiorespiratory failure
undergoing extracorporeal life support. Interventions: The accuracy o
f the oximeters was determined by simultaneously comparing the saturat
ion displayed by the pulse oximeters (test oximeters 1 and 2) and/or t
he in-line oximeter (test oximeter 3) with the measured fractional ven
ous oxygen saturation obtained at regular intervals from the extracorp
oreal circuit. Main Outcome Measures: Venous oxygen saturation was the
criterion standard used to determine accuracy. Bias was defined as th
e mean difference between observed pulse oximeter or in-line oximeter
values and the measured venous oxygen saturation. Mean biases were cal
culated for venous oxygen saturation measurements between 55% and 99%
at intervals of 10%. Precision (the standard deviation of the bias) wa
s calculated for low (55% to 75%), medium (76% to 81%), and high (82%
to 99%) venous oxygen saturation values. A total of 983 venous oxygen
saturation measurements were made and compared with simultaneous oxime
ter readings from test oximeter 1 (n = 600), test oximeter 2 (n = 478)
, and test oximeter 3 (n = 587). Results: Test oximeter 1 was the most
precise instrument at each level of venous oxygen saturation (SD, 4.0
to 4.8). Test oximeter 3 demonstrated the most consistent mean bias (
range, 8), but was the most inaccurate oximeter across all levels of v
enous oxygen saturation. Conclusions: In addition to its known clinica
l usefulness, pulse oximetry may serve as an adequate substitute for i
n-line oximetry during extracorporeal life support.