D. Korenaga et al., ROLE OF INTRAOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS AND SEROSAL INVASION IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC-CANCER, Journal of surgical oncology, 55(4), 1994, pp. 250-254
The clinical diagnoses of nodal status (N) and tumor invasion (T) were
performed intraoperatively during 1499 consecutive operations for gas
tric carcinoma and compared with subsequent pathologic diagnoses. An a
ccurate macroscopic diagnosis of N stage was difficult; overall accura
cy was only 56.6%. Intraoperative assessment of T stage (particularly
of serosal invasion) was correct for 93.2% of early stages of the dise
ase with invasion confined to the mucosa or submucosa (pT1) when the p
athologist assessed the T stage in the resected specimen, for 95.6% of
advanced tumors invading the serosa (pT3), but for tumors of an inter
mediate stage with invasion involving the muscularis propria or the su
bserosa (pT2) in only 41.9% of cases. Macroscopic overestimation occur
red in 58. 1 % of cases with pT2 tumors, which were characterized by c
arcinomas in the upper third of the stomach, tumors larger than 5 cm,
carcinomas of the ulcerating type, differentiated adenocarcinomas, tum
ors invading the subserosa, and those accompanied by lymph node metast
asis or liver metastasis. The overestimated group had a significantly
poorer prognosis than the correctly assessed cases (P < 0.05). Since m
ultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significant r
isk factor related to the inaccurate intraoperative assessment of T st
age was tumor size, the error in diagnosis may correlate with a greate
r degree of tumor spread. Surgeons should decide their therapeutic app
roach at the time of surgery on the basis of their intraoperative asse
ssment of tumor spread. We recommend extensive surgery followed by ade
quate chemotherapy when serosal invasion is suspected at surgery. (C)
1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.