Wa. Brantley et al., PERFORMANCE OF ENGINE-DRIVEN ROTARY ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS WITH A SUPERIMPOSED BENDING DEFLECTION .5. GATES GLIDDEN AND PEESO DRILLS, Journal of endodontics, 20(5), 1994, pp. 241-245
A laboratory study was performed on Gates Glidden and Peeso drills to
determine the incidence of shaft fracture when a bending deflection wa
s superimposed on the rotating drills. Samples of sizes #1 to #6 stain
less steel Gates Glidden drills, sizes #1 to #6 stainless steel and ca
rbon steel-type P Peeso drills, and sizes #009 to #023 carbon steel-ty
pe B-1 Peeso drills from each of two manufacturers were evaluated with
a unique apparatus that applied a 2-mm bending deflection while rotat
ing the instruments. The apparatus did not restrict movement of the bu
r head during rotation. The test drills were rotated at 2500, 4000, an
d 7000 revolutions per minute, and the number of revolutions at failur
e was recorded. Scanning electron microscopic observations established
that the stainless steel Gates Glidden and Peeso drills failed by duc
tile fracture, whereas the carbon steel Peeso drills failed by brittle
fracture. Instrument fracture was always near the handpiece shank wit
h this test, and the length of the fractured drills was measured from
the working tip. It is recommended that this additional test be adopte
d to determine fatigue properties of engine-driven rotary endodontic i
nstruments in establishing international performance standards.