Data from a nationally representative survey of child care centers and
a 5-site, observational study of centers were used to examine the qua
lity of care provided to children from low-income families. Comparison
s were made to a national sample of centers; among Head Start, public
school-sponsored, and other community-based subsidized centers; and am
ong centers that Served families from differing socioeconoMiC groups.
The quality of care in centers that served predominantly low-income ch
ildren was adequate, but highly variable, with structural indices exhi
biting higher quality than observations of global quality and of staff
-child interactions. When compared to Head Start and public school-spo
nsored centers, the community-based centers had smaller groups and few
er children per teacher for preschoolers, but also had less well educa
ted and compensated staff. Centers that predominantly served children
from upper-income families provided the highest quality of care across
multiple indices, and those that predominantly served children from m
iddle-income families almost uniformly provided the poorest quality of
care. The centers that served children from low-income families did n
ot differ significantly in quality from the upper-income centers on mo
st indices. However, the teachers in these programs were observed to b
e less sensitive and more harsh than teachers in the centers that serv
ed more advantaged families. The implications of the findings for rese
arch and policy are discussed.