ERROR-MINIMIZING KRYLOV SUBSPACE METHODS
Citation
R. Weiss, ERROR-MINIMIZING KRYLOV SUBSPACE METHODS, SIAM journal on scientific computing, 15(3), 1994, pp. 511-527
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Sciences",Mathematics
SICI code
1064-8275(1994)15:3<511:EKSM>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Iterative methods for the solution of linear systems are usually contr
olled by the observation of the norm of the residual. In reality, the
error should be controlled, but the error is not available. The residu
als and the errors are connected by the condition number of the system
matrix. If the system is well conditioned, the decrease of the errors
is closely connected to the decrease of the residuals. For these case
s, Krylov subspace methods that minimize the residuals in the Euclidea
n norm or in the energy norm are powerful solution techniques. If the
system is ill conditioned, the residuals can decrease while the errors
increase. For these systems, arising even from very simple and common
ly used differential equations, iterative methods that minimize the re
siduals may require a large number of iterations to reduce the errors.
The user may be misled to stop the iteration too early by small resid
uals. Two families of error-minimizing Krylov subspace methods are pro
posed to overcome these difficulties. Each of them is suited for diffe
rent problem types. Principles for the design of generalized cg method
s that minimize the error are derived from the geometric convergence b
ehavior of generalized cg methods. These methods use the transposed sy
stem matrix multiplied by the system matrix as the iteration matrix. B
y this technique a fast convergence is achieved for matrices with clus
tered singular values and scattered eigenvalues. A class of Krylov sub
space methods minimizing the error by using the simple transposed matr
ix as the iteration matrix is proposed. Various realization possibilit
ies are inherent in these generalized minimum error methods. The metho
ds are analyzed theoretically. Common and related properties with gene
ralized conjugate gradient methods are presented. These techniques sho
uld be preferred if the eigenvalues are more clustered than the singul
ar values. The first promising tests for one distinct method are prese
nted.