This paper tests the conjecture that the divergence of willingness to
pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) for identical goods is drive
n by the degree of substitution between goods. In contrast to well-kno
wn results for market goods with close substitutes (i.e., candy bars a
nd coffee mugs), our results indicate a convergence of WTP and WTA mea
sures of value. However, for a nonmarket good with imperfect substitut
es (i.e., reduced health risk), the divergence of WTP and WTA value me
asures is persistent, even with repeated market participation and full
information on the nature of the good.