Bertrand's random-chord paradox purports to illustrate the inconsisten
cy of the principle of indifference when applied to problems in which
the number of possible cases is infinite. This paper shows that Bertra
nd's original problem is vaguely posed, but demonstrates that clearly
stated variations lead to different, but theoretically and empirically
self-consistent solutions. The resolution of the paradox lies in appr
eciating how different geometric entities, represented by uniformly di
stributed random variables, give rise to respectively different nonuni
form distributions of random chords, and hence to different probabilit
ies. The principle of indifference appears consistently applicable to
infinite sets provided that problems can be formulated unambiguously.