SHOULDER JOINT STABILITY AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC SUBACROMIAL DECOMPRESSION

Citation
T. Schneider et al., SHOULDER JOINT STABILITY AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC SUBACROMIAL DECOMPRESSION, Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 113(3), 1994, pp. 129-133
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics,Surgery
ISSN journal
09368051
Volume
113
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
129 - 133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0936-8051(1994)113:3<129:SJSAAS>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
In 55 patients with type I or type II impingement lesions we performed arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Fifty-two patients are follow ed up 1 year postoperatively. In all patients the condition of the aff ected shoulder before and after decompression was documented using a 1 00-point shoulder score (pain on activity, 15 points; pain without act ivity, 15 points; function, 20 points; weight lifting, 10 points; musc le strength, 15 points; range of motion, 25 points). At follow-up we a lso documented the extent of passive inferior shift of the humeral hea d by ultrasound. The mean score preoperatively was 60.9 (+/- 13.8). Po stoperatively there was a significant increase to 84.7 (+/- 12.5). The average postoperative hospital stay was 8.8 days (+/- 2.1). In 12 pat ients (23%) the postoperative score was less than 85 points, and in th ese the treatment was considered to have failed. Comparison of these p atients as a group with those in whom the treatment was successful rev ealed no difference in age, a small but not significant difference in the preoperative duration of shoulder complaints, and no difference in the postoperative length of stay in hospital. However, there was a si gnificant difference in the extent of passive inferior shift of the hu meral head: in the failure group the mean inferior shift was 4.6 +/- 1 .9 mm, while in the other patients the shift was only 2.7 +/- 1.0 mm. This difference was statistically highly significant. There was a stat istical highly significant negative Pearson correlation coefficient of -5.56 between postoperative score and inferior shift of the humeral h ead. We conclude that patients with subacromial pathology and hypermob ile glenohumeral joints may not be good candidates for subacromial dec ompression.