The hemizona assay is an important diagnostic tool in assessing human
sperm fertilizing potential. Previous hemizona assay results have prov
en that this functional test is a good predictor of fertilization in v
itro and can be used in clinical practice to supply additional informa
tion in male factor subfertility cases. The objective of this study wa
s to compare two methods for cutting human zona pellucida into equal h
alves (manual handcutting versus micromanipulation) in order to examin
e the necessity of an expensive micromanipulator in performing this as
say. Comparable results for recovery rate, diameter size of the hemizo
nae, and sperm binding were achieved with both methods. According to t
hese results, the use of an expensive micromanipulator is not essentia
l in performing the hemizona assay.