Rj. Barrett et al., DISCRIMINATION OF A(1) VERSES A(2) RECEPTOR SUBTYPE SELECTIVITY OF ADENOSINE RECEPTOR AGONISTS IN-VIVO, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 268(3), 1994, pp. 1166-1173
Previous attempts to discern and quantify the selectivity of agonists
for A(1) versus A(2) adenosine receptors in vivo have been confounded
by the activation of baroreceptor reflexes and/or simultaneous express
ion of responses to both A(1) and A(2) receptor activation. In anesthe
tized, vagotomized rats with isolated in situ constant-flow perfused h
indquarters (HQ), bradycardic responses to i.v. agonist injections mea
sured A(1) receptor activation and HQ vasodilation elicited by i.a. ag
onist injections measured the stimulation of A(2) receptors. Adenosine
and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) produced A(2) receptor-medi
ated HQ vasodilation at doses 8- and 4-fold lower (-log ED(50) values,
7.3 +/- 0.04 mol and 8.7 +/- 0.06 mol, respectively) than those requi
red to evoke A(1) receptor-mediated bradycardia (-log ED(50) values, 6
.4 +/- 0.01 mol and 8.1 +/- 0.07 mol, respectively). N-6-cyclopentylad
enosine (CPA) was approximately 8-fold selective for A(1) receptors (-
log ED(50) values, A(1), 8.5 +/- 0.05 mol; A(2), 7.6 +/- 0.16 mol). 2-
(Phenylamino)adenosine (CV-1808) and 2[2(4-fluorophenyl)ethoxy]adenosi
ne (FPEA) were at least 125- and 200-fold more potent agonists at A(2)
receptors (-log ED(50) values, 7.7 +/- 0.10 mol and 8.0 +/- 0.24 mol,
respectively) than at A(1) receptors (-log ED(50) values, 5.6 +/- 0.0
8 mol and 5.7 +/- 0.01 mol, respectively). These studies demonstrated
that stimulation of A(1) and A(2) receptors may be discriminated in vi
vo and that such responses are selective, reproducible, dose-dependent
and quantifiable. A comparison of these in vivo measures with known i
n vitro data suggests that the A(2a) adenosine receptor mediates vasod
ilation in the rat HQ and that in vitro assays may predict the orders
of potency of adenosine A(1) and A(2a) receptor agonists in vivo but t
hey are less reliable predictors of the absolute potency and, hence, t
he A(1)/A(2) receptor selectivity of agonists.