PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY AND 4-YEAR DEVELOPMENT OF BACK STRENGTH IN CHILDREN

Citation
K. Newcomer et al., PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY AND 4-YEAR DEVELOPMENT OF BACK STRENGTH IN CHILDREN, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 76(1), 1997, pp. 52-58
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
08949115
Volume
76
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
52 - 58
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-9115(1997)76:1<52:PA4DOB>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Physical activity in children is important, both for its direct benefi ts and for establishing potentially lasting future behaviors. Understa nding the development of back strength in children is also important, because decreased back strength is associated with low back pain in ad ults. We hypothesized the following: (1) a substantial percentage of c hildren do not participate in adequate physical activity; (2) the deve lopment of back strength corresponds to the development of strength of appendicular muscles; (3) there is a positive relationship between ph ysical activity and back strength. The study included 53 boys and 43 g irls, aged 10 to 19 yr, who had undergone isometric strength testing 4 yr previously. From responses to a questionnaire, each child's level of physical and sedentary activity was calculated. Isometric back flex ion and extension were measured with the same method used 4 yr previou sly. Statistical analyses were performed, including quadratic regressi ons to estimate the rate of increase in strength, height, and weight. The following results were found: (1) during the month before testing, 21 children participated in physical activity for less than 30 min/da y; (2) the level of physical activity was significantly associated wit h back flexion and back extension (P = 0.03 for both); (3) the peak ra te of increase in back strength occurred approximately 1 yr after the peak rate of increase in height. We conclude the following: (1) measur es should be taken to increase the involvement of children in athletic activities; 2) physical activity may be important in the development of back strength; (3) the pattern of back strength development seems t o be the same as that for development of muscles of the appendicular s keleton.