NONRESPONSE PATTERN AND BIAS IN A COMMUNITY-BASED CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF COGNITIVE-FUNCTIONING AMONG THE ELDERLY

Citation
Lj. Launer et al., NONRESPONSE PATTERN AND BIAS IN A COMMUNITY-BASED CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF COGNITIVE-FUNCTIONING AMONG THE ELDERLY, American journal of epidemiology, 139(8), 1994, pp. 803-812
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00029262
Volume
139
Issue
8
Year of publication
1994
Pages
803 - 812
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(1994)139:8<803:NPABIA>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The demographic, health, and mental functioning characteristics of non responders to a community-based cross-sectional study of cognitive fun ctioning among the elderly in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Amsterdam St udy of the Elderly (AMSTEL), October 1990 to May 1991), were examined and compared with responders. The randomly selected age-stratified (65 -74, 75-84 years) sample was drawn from nonresponders listed with a su bsample (n = 8) of general practitioners whose lists served as the sam pling frame for the main study. The general practitioners approached a nd interviewed the responding nonresponders using the same standardize d questions that were used in the main study. Nonresponders (n = 115) and responders (n = 999) from the same medical practices were compared by means of chi-square and odds ratios. Compared with responders, the se nonresponders more often reported a history of psychiatric illness, heart attack, stroke, and diabetes, and were more likely to be unmarr ied, to have a lower education, and to do poorly on the cognitive test (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.6). Most significant physical and mental health differences by response status were seen a mong the persons aged <75 years and not among those aged greater than or equal to 75 years. The odds for poor cognitive test performance ass ociated with age and stroke were relatively more biased than those ass ociated with other risk factors. These results suggest that the charac teristics of young-old and old-old elderly nonresponders to cross-sect ional studies of cognitive function may differ, and that there may be selective nonresponse that could bias, to a different degree, estimate s of risk for poor cognitive functioning. Studies should investigate t he possibilities for nonresponse in their own setting.