A growing body of theory and research has emerged on the sources of ow
nership of firearms for defensive purposes. In contrast, little attent
ion has been given to ownership of other means of protection that also
are potentially injurious. To address this omission in the literature
, this study examined the ownership not only of guns but also of watch
dogs. Based on a survey of 509 residents of Edmond, Oklahoma, the anal
ysis assessed the utility of the ''fear and loathing'' and ''collectiv
e security'' perspectives in accounting for ownership of these differi
ng forms of potentially injurious means of protection against crime. T
he analysis was unsuccessful in accounting for ownership of watchdogs,
but support was found for the ''fear and loathing'' explanation of fi
rearm ownership.