Ectoparasites (blowflies, lice, ticks, and mites) are not the main thr
eat to farm production in New Zealand but are major concerns to the fa
rmer and are a drain on resources. Lice and blowflies have been presen
t from the earliest days of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand, as wa
s the scab mite, Psoroptes ovis, supposedly extinct since the 1880s. T
he cattle tick, Haemaphysalis longicornis, was a later addition to New
Zealand's arthropod pest fauna, which has been extended further by th
e relatively recent introduction of the Australian sheep blowfly, Luci
lia cuprina. Lesser players such as the sheep ked (Melophagus ovinus),
mange mites (Chorioptes spp., Psorergates ovis, Psoroptes spp., Demod
ex spp.), and a bot fly (Oestrus ovis) add their tiny din as backgroun
d noise to the orchestrated effects of the main players. Estimates of
the monetary losses due to ectoparasites can be computed, but their lo
ng-term value is doubtful - particularly when seen against a backgroun
d of fluctuating world prices and occasional reversals of differential
values between, say, carcase and by-products. Flystrike alone is esti
mated to cost >$30 million annually. To this can be added the losses d
ue to other ectoparasites. In the light of these costs it is clear tha
t the <$1 million currently spent annually on research demonstrates hi
gh cost-effectiveness. However, given the continuing application of pe
sticides (and the attendant drain on overseas funds to purchase them),
plus the labour associated with preventing or alleviating ectoparasit
e damage, and the production losses or deaths that cannot be Prevented
, a net loss to farming due to ectoparasites cannot be denied. This pa
per briefly examines the historical aspects of the ectoparasites of li
vestock in New Zealand, and follows with a view of their current preva
lence, geographical distribution, and economics. Next there is a discu
ssion of the management (''control'') methods currently employed, cons
idering topics such as insecticide resistance, biological control, mol
ecular biology, and rural sociology. Finally, I attempt a glimpse into
the future, based on the assumption that unrestricted use of insectic
ides may no longer be an option for agriculture within the next 20 yea
rs, or sooner.