Rm. Irving et al., BONE PATE OBLITERATION OR REVISION MASTOIDECTOMY - A 5-SYMPTOM COMPARATIVE-STUDY, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences, 19(2), 1994, pp. 158-160
A survey of 47 patients who underwent surgical treatment for persisten
t symptomatic mastoid cavities following mastoidectomy for cholesteato
ma, was carried out. There were two groups comprising 26 patients who
underwent revision mastoidectomy (14 with meatoplasty); the technique
favoured early in the series, and 21 managed by mastoid revision and o
bliteration with autologous bone pate and a superiorly based temporali
s musculo-periosteal flap. A questionnaire' was used to assign a sympt
om score to each patients pre and post-operative condition, with a max
imum score of 15 and minimum of zero. The pre-operative scores for the
two groups were not significantly different, but the patients treated
by obliteration with bone pate had a significantly lower (P = 0.05) p
ostoperative symptom score than those who had their mastoids simply re
vised. This study suggests that revision mastoidectomy with bone pate
obliteration achieves a more favourable result than revision mastoidec
tomy alone, and is, we believe, the technique of choice for the patien
t with a symptomatic mastoid cavity.