This communication aims to show why guidelines to prevent discomfort o
f static postures can be based on endurance data, and to give insight
in the aim and scope of a recent 'work-rest model for static postures'
(WR model). The paper is a response to a recent paper of Mathiassen a
nd Winkel (1992) who questioned the usefulness of discomfort and endur
ance data, and of the WR model for developing guidelines for static po
stures. It is concluded that discomfort can be considered as an indepe
ndent evaluation variable for working postures, anchored in European l
egislation. Discomfort can be predicted from the 'remaining endurance
capacity' (REC) because of a known relationship between the REC and di
scomfort as measured with the Borg rating scale. The WR model estimate
s at group level the mean REC of a static posture with or without an e
xternal force during and immediately after a work-rest schedule. The W
R model is meant to assist practitioners in the assessment and optimiz
ation of static postures (and external forces) and work-rest schedules
in order to avoid high levels of discomfort.