Eighty male volunteers participated in an analogue study of the effect
s of alcohol intoxication at the time of a crime on the physiological
detection of deception using control question and guilty knowledge tec
hniques. Sixty-four of the subjects committed a mock crime and half of
these were intoxicated during the crime. Sixteen subjects committed n
o crime and served as innocent controls. We found that intoxication at
the time of the crime had no significant effect on polygraph test out
comes, although it did affect anticipatory arousal before the crime an
d subsequent memory for crime details. Manipulations designed to influ
ence memory for crime details and arousal during the crime had differe
ntial effects for the two polygraph tests. On the guilty knowledge tes
t, primed subjects who rehearsed specific details following the crime
were more detectable than unprimed subjects. On the control question t
est, primed subjects were also more detectable, but only when arousal
during the crime was high.