J. Brodeur, RESEARCH ON FACTORS DETERMINING HEALTH - ROLE OF THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE 21ST-CENTURY, Clinical and investigative medicine, 17(2), 1994, pp. 142-147
During the next few decades, actions on matters dealing with environme
ntal pollution will have to be aimed at: 1) eliminating environmental
contaminants at the source; 2) identifying biomarkers of exposure and/
or adverse health effects; 3) improving our skills at assessing the pr
obability of occurrence of adverse health effects in the community; an
d 4) informing the Canadian public in a responsible manner. Primary so
urces of pollution related to human activities should be our deep conc
ern: utilization of energy sources, particularly fossil fuels; agricul
tural activities, such as deforestation and use of fertilizers and pes
ticides; and industrialization, responsible for the synthesis of numer
ous new molecules. Clinical investigators will be faced with rare dise
ase entities characterized by low-level, long-term exposure via food,
air, water and soil, and low-incidence responses (e.g. cancer, neuroto
xicity, reproductive failure, immunotoxicity). Epidemiologists and tox
icologists will be pressed, by the Canadian public, to answer question
s regarding the probability of occurrence of health effects as a resul
t of exposure to environmental contaminants. Collectively, as scientis
ts, our attitudes will have to change drastically; high in the order o
f importance is the need to communicate with the public and to diligen
tly inform our fellow citizens about the relationship between health a
nd environment. In doing so, we might find allies to support our claim
that health research in Canada deserves much better support.