Decision-makers often make choices in situations where an authority (e
.g., a parent, a boss, a tradition) has prescribed a choice. Submittin
g to an authority's prescription is advantageous in that any decision
costs associated with comparing alternative choices can be avoided. Ho
wever, the authority's prescription may be far from optimal, meaning a
decision-maker may also be motivated to deviate from the prescription
. In an experimental setting, this paper examines how the decision-mak
ing process and the quality of decisions are affected by changes in th
e quality of the authority's prescribed choice, changes in the level o
f punishment for disobedience, and changes in the decision-making envi
ronment.