Richard Thaler has made a number of claims about the peculiar motives
people have for their economic behaviour. This paper is sympathetic to
Thaler's project, but argues that there is a problem with the evidenc
e he uses to support his claims. The problem is that Thaler's main cla
ims problem with the evidence he uses to support his claims. The probl
em is that Thaler's main claims are about the motivation for economic
action, but his main evidence is not about motivation but about behavi
our. In failing to provide evidence about motives, Thaler's claims are
vulnerable. To illustrate this problem the paper focuses on an exampl
e of the apparently anomalous behaviour of wine owners which Thaler us
es. Employing some evidence about the motivations of wine owners, the
paper challenges Thaler's claims that the behaviour of wine owners is
explained by the 'endowment effect' and 'loss aversion.'