DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION

Citation
Cvs. Ram et al., DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN PATIENTS WITH MILD-TO-MODERATE HYPERTENSION, Clinical cardiology, 17(5), 1994, pp. 251-256
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
01609289
Volume
17
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
251 - 256
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-9289(1994)17:5<251:DCOAAH>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
In the final analysis of this study at Week 26, 26% of the patients ra ndomized to receive amlodipine attained blood pressure control with am lodipine alone compared with 33% of the patients allocated to hydrochl orothiazide (HCTZ). Neither amlodipine nor HCTZ produced clinically si gnificant changes in pulse rate or in the electrocardiogram. Amlodipin e treatment did not appear to produce clinically significant changes i n blood lipids; HCTZ, however, produced an increase in total plasma ch olesterol (DELTA22.9 +/- 8.6 mg/dl). The incidence of side effects and the rate of patient withdrawal in the amlodipine and HCTZ groups were comparable. As expected, HCTZ therapy caused well-recognized biochemi cal alterations in cholesterol and potassium levels, whereas amlodipin e was metabolically neutral.