Contact dermatitis among hairdressers is common. In The Netherlands, r
egistered sick leave for hand dermatitis among hairdressers rose from
21,050 days in 1986 to 54,293 in 1991. In a survey among 45 hairdresse
rs in 5 different salons, 12 had a history of hand dermatitis and 16 s
howed moderate to severe hand dermatitis. After extensive investigatio
ns, 13 were classified as having allergic contact dermatitis and 3 cum
ulative irritant contact dermatitis. In the past 4 years, 103 hairdres
sers were extensively patch tested and glyceryl thioglycolate (GTG), a
mmonium persulfate and nickel sulfate were responsible for the majorit
y of positive reactions. Hair dyes and preservatives were responsible
for a moderate % of the positive reactions. Positive reactions were al
so found to cocamidopropyl betaine and sodium coco hydrolyzed animal p
rotein. These 2 allergens show a rather capricious patch test reaction
pattern and irritant reactions may easily be confused with allergic.
The relevance of positive patch test reactions to these chemicals shou
ld always be questioned. Atopy was not a frequent cause of hand dermat
itis in this study. Chemicals with a thiol group can be demonstrated w
ith a chemical spot test. With this test, contamination of the hairdre
ssing salon with thioglycolates was demonstrated. It is emphasized tha
t contamination of hairdressing salons with GTG is probably a signific
ant factor in explaining the severe flare-ups in GTG-sensitized hairdr
essers who no longer use GTG permanent-waving solutions.