THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
Wj. Hoskins et al., THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 170(4), 1994, pp. 974-980
OBJECTIVE: The Gynecologic Oncology Group has divided patients with ad
vanced epithelial ovarian cancer into those with optimal residual canc
er, in which the maximum diameter of residual is less than or equal to
1 cm, and suboptimal residual cancer, in which the residual disease i
s > 1 cm. Within the optimal group of patients there is a survival dif
ference between patients with microscopic residual disease and those w
ith any macroscopic disease less than or equal to 1 cm. No analysis of
the effect of various residual disease diameters in patients with res
idual disease greater than or equal to 1 cm has been performed. This s
tudy evaluates the effect of residual disease diameter in patients wit
h suboptimal disease entered on a randomized trial of intense versus s
tandard chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: Gynecologic Oncology Group protoco
l 97 compared cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) fo
r eight courses with the same drugs at 100 mg/m(2) and 1000 mg/m(2) fo
r four courses, respectively. There was no difference in progression-f
ree interval or survival between the two arms. Or the 458 stage III (w
ith residual disease > 1 cm) and stage IV patients entered in this stu
dy, 294 stage III patients comprise the current analysis. Surgical rep
orting forms, operation reports, and pathology reports were reviewed t
o determine initial greatest tumor diameter and residual tumor diamete
r. Patients were grouped by residual diameter. Multivariate analysis c
onsidered residual diameter of disease, age, histologic characteristic
s, performance status, and ascites. An adjusted relative hazard of dyi
ng of ovarian cancer was calculated for each residual disease group. R
ESULTS: Patients ranged in age from 20 to 80 years, with a median of 6
0 years. All patients were Gynecologic Oncology Group performance stat
us 0 to 2. Fifty-two percent had grade 3 tumors, and 39% and 9%, respe
ctively, had grade 2 or 1 tumors. All patients had stage III disease.
Ninety percent had serous, endometrioid, or mixed epithelial cell type
tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed a relative risk of dying as fo
llows: residual disease < 2 cm, relative risk 1.00; 2 to 2.9 cm, relat
ive risk 1.90; 3 to 3.9 cm, relative risk 1.91; 4 to 5.9 cm, relative
risk 1.74; 6 to 7.9 cm, relative risk 1.85; 8 to 9.9 cm, relative risk
2.16; greater than or equal to 10 cm, relative risk 1.82. The differe
nce in survival between those with < 2 cm residual disease and those w
ith greater than or equal to 2 cm residual disease was significant (p
< 0.01). There is no significant difference in the risk of dying betwe
en groups with residual disease greater than or equal to 2 cm. CONCLUS
IONS: Among patients with suboptimal (> 1 cm residual disease) epithel
ial ovarian cancer, those who have small diameter residual disease (<
2 cm) tend to survive longer than those who have larger residual disea
se. Among those with larger residual disease, size does not affect pro
gnosis appreciably.