THE IMPORTANCE OF SELECTING A SAMPLING MODEL BEFORE DATA-COLLECTION -AN EXAMPLE USING THE ENDANGERED HUMBOLDT MILK-VETCH (ASTRAGALUS-AGNICIDUS BARNEBY)
Aj. Pickart et Hb. Stauffer, THE IMPORTANCE OF SELECTING A SAMPLING MODEL BEFORE DATA-COLLECTION -AN EXAMPLE USING THE ENDANGERED HUMBOLDT MILK-VETCH (ASTRAGALUS-AGNICIDUS BARNEBY), Natural areas journal, 14(2), 1994, pp. 90-98
Numerous sampling models exist as alternatives to simple random or sys
tematic sampling. The appropriate application of one of these models m
ay increase efficiency and decrease the cost of sampling. However, unl
ess a model is chosen and a sampling methodology appropriate to the mo
del is developed prior to data collection, the estimator is likely to
be biased. As an example, we present a case in which a single methodol
ogy was used to sample pod production of Humboldt milk-vetch (Astragal
us agnicidus Barneby) using three sampling models after the fact to ob
tain estimates. The results of the three analyses - cluster, two-stage
, and double sampling - are contrasted with respect to estimated preci
sion and bias. The two-stage estimator yielded the least precise but t
he only unbiased estimator. This example illustrates some serious nega
tive consequences of the relatively uncommon practice of collecting da
ta before a sampling model has been identified.