THE KINETICS AND MECHANISM OF REPAIR OF UV INDUCED DNA-DAMAGE IN MAMMALIAN-CELLS - THE USE OF CAGED NUCLEOTIDES AND ELECTROPORATION TO STUDY SHORT-TIME COURSE EVENTS IN DNA-REPAIR
Ra. Meldrum et al., THE KINETICS AND MECHANISM OF REPAIR OF UV INDUCED DNA-DAMAGE IN MAMMALIAN-CELLS - THE USE OF CAGED NUCLEOTIDES AND ELECTROPORATION TO STUDY SHORT-TIME COURSE EVENTS IN DNA-REPAIR, Nucleic acids research, 22(7), 1994, pp. 1234-1241
Using 'caged' DNA break trapping agents as well as the equivalent unca
ged reagents and an automated apparatus, we have measured time courses
of incorporation of radiolabelled nucleotides into HL60 cellular DNA
in the early stages after 248 UV laser damage. These time courses show
two distinctive phases, one between 0 and 120 seconds and another aft
er 120 sees following damage. The first phase consists of a transient
which shows a rapid initial incorporation of radiolabel followed by a
sharp fall in incorporated label. This occurs with TTP as well as ddAT
P, which suggests that an excision activity which results in removal o
f recently incorporated bases is not solely provoked by the incorporat
ion of an unnatural base, but also by the incorporation of an incorrec
tly paired base in a phase of what may be low fidelity repair. The sec
ond phase consists of a more steady state of incorporation. Both phase
s are dose dependent and show higher incorporation at higher doses. Th
e transient is most apparent at does which cause some lethality. It ma
y represent a form of emergency or 'panic' repair where it seems that
there may be an immediate effort to maintain strand continuity in the
damaged DNA. Results of experiments with polymerase inhibitors suggest
that a polymerase which is sensitive to aphidicholin and which shows
some sensitivity to dideoxythymidine is active during the transient ph
ase of repair. Since excision of newly incorporated radiolabel takes p
lace very rapidly during the first phase this would imply that a polym
erase with an associated proof-reading nuclease is active at this stag
e. Polymerases alpha, delta, and epsilon all have this property but de
lta and epsilon have a higher sensitivity to dideoxythymidine than doe
s alpha. Since the transient burst phase shows significant inhibition
by dideoxythymidine, it is more likely that delta or epsilon are activ
e at this stage. The putative panic response discussed in relation to
proof reading mechanisms in aminocyl-tRNA and DNA synthesis.