EVIDENCE-BASED CARE .2. SETTING GUIDELINES - HOW SHOULD WE MANAGE THIS PROBLEM

Citation
Ad. Oxman et al., EVIDENCE-BASED CARE .2. SETTING GUIDELINES - HOW SHOULD WE MANAGE THIS PROBLEM, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association journal, 150(9), 1994, pp. 1417-1423
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
08203946
Volume
150
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1417 - 1423
Database
ISI
SICI code
0820-3946(1994)150:9<1417:EC.SG->2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
There are four steps in determining how to manage a clinical problem. The first is to formulate questions that are answerable; the second is to locate and synthesize the evidence needed to answer the questions; the third is to estimate the expected benefits, harms and costs of ea ch option based on the evidence; and the fourth is to judge the relati ve value of the expected outcomes to conclude whether the benefits are worth the harms and costs. It is impractical to repeat these steps fo r every clinical decision. Therefore, implicitly or explicitly, physic ians rely on guidelines, ''rules'' that simplify decision making about complex problems. If the methods used to develop a guideline are not explicit it is difficult or impossible to know how much confidence to place in it. Therefore, for common and important clinical problems, ph ysicians should rely on guidelines that are systematically developed u sing explicit methods.