Aj. Weber et Lr. Stanford, SYNAPTOLOGY OF PHYSIOLOGICALLY IDENTIFIED GANGLION-CELLS IN THE CAT RETINA - A COMPARISON OF RETINAL X-CELLS AND Y-CELLS, Journal of comparative neurology, 343(3), 1994, pp. 483-499
It has long been known that a number of functionally different types o
f ganglion cells exist in the cat retina, and that each responds diffe
rently to visual stimulation. To determine whether the characteristic
response properties of different retinal ganglion cell types might ref
lect differences in the number and distribution of their bipolar and a
macrine cell inputs, we compared the percentages and distributions of
the synaptic inputs from bipolar and amacrine cells to the entire dend
ritic arbors of physiologically characterized retinal X- and Y-cells.
Sixty-two percent of the synaptic input to the Y-cell was from amacrin
e cell terminals, while the X-cells received approximately equal amoun
ts of input from amacrine and bipolar cells. We found no significant d
ifference in the distributions of bipolar or amacrine cell inputs to X
- and Y-cells, or ON-center and OFF-center cells, either as a function
of dendritic branch order or distance from the origin of the dendriti
c arbor. While, on the basis of these data, we cannot exclude the poss
ibility that the difference in the proportion of bipolar and amacrine
cell input contributes to the functional differences between X- and Y-
cells, the magnitude of this difference, and the similarity in the dis
tributions of the input from the two afferent cell types, suggest that
mechanisms other than a simple predominance of input from amacrine or
bipolar cells underlie the differences in their response properties.
More likely, perhaps, is that the specific response features of X- and
Y-cells originate in differences in the visual responses of the bipol
ar and amacrine cells that provide their input, or in the complex syna
ptic arrangements found among amacrine and bipolar cell terminals and
the dendrites of specific types of retinal ganglion cells. (C) 1994 Wi
ley-Liss, Inc.