Over the past 15 years, researchers have shown an increasing interest
in using event-related potentials (ERPs) to study depression. These st
udies generally fall into four classes: 1), ERPs as a means of detecti
ng depression; 2), ERPs as a tool for distinguishing subtypes of depre
ssion; 3), ERPs as a measure of pharmacological effectiveness; 4), ERP
s as indicators of defective cognitive operations in depressed subject
s. Results from these heterogeneous approaches are often inconsistent
and disappointing. Although some ERP components often show increased l
atencies and diminished amplitudes, these changes seem to reflect prin
cipally a variety of non-specific disorders affecting a wide range of
cognitive functions rather than a precise and consistent deficit of a
particular function. These disappointing results seem to be attributab
le to methodological problems (heterogeneous patient populations, disp
roportionate use of the odd-ball paradigm), and do not necessarily cal
l into question the value of studying the ERPs. Furthermore, recent ad
vances in ERP methodology have opened up new perspectives for ERP use
in psychopathology.