L. Carlsson et al., BONE RESPONSE TO HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED AND COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUMIMPLANTS IN THE HUMAN ARTHRITIC KNEE, Journal of orthopaedic research, 12(2), 1994, pp. 274-285
Rough and smooth commercially pure (c.p.) titanium implants and hydrox
y-apatite-coated (HA-C) implants were inserted in arthritic human knee
s and left in situ in order to compare the response of bone to these t
hree implants. Radiographic examination alone could not determine if b
one apposition had occurred. After 3 and 6 months, histomorphometric a
nalyses of undecalcified sections, 10 mu m thick, revealed a statistic
al significance in the amount of bone apposition to rough-surfaced and
HA-C implants as compared with smooth uncoated implants. Most of the
rough-surfaced c.p. titanium implants and the HA-C implants had achiev
ed bone apposition on the order of 50%. No statistically significant d
ifferences in apposition were seen between the rough-surfaced and HA-C
implants. The smooth c.p. titanium implants were mostly encapsulated
in fibrous tissue.