This paper describes qualitative research into difficulties university
freshmen displayed when 'forced' to use thermodynamic 'concepts', or
rather 'words', in a thermodynamic context which was, at that time, no
t (yet) their own context. The research also aims at the identificatio
n and the naming of students' proto-thermodynamic context(s), focused
on their concepts of work and heat, and taking a thermodynamic basic c
ontext of work and heat, previously described as an objective of educa
tion, as a frame of reference. Three 'rounds' of research were perform
ed in three successive years, each elaborating on the preceding one. T
he first 'round' concentrated mainly on students' general problems wit
h the thermodynamic concept of heat in a thermodynamic context. The se
cond and the third concentrated mainly on the way a 'transition' from
a commonplace concept of work in an ordinary life context to a scienti
fic concept of work is suggested in a much used Dutch secondary school
method of physics education. Our first conclusion is that the observe
d freshmen used 'heat' and 'work' in what we have named a 'thermochemi
cal context'; this can be seen as a proto-thermodynamic context. In ad
dition, they had great difficulties with the thermodynamic system conc
ept. Both conclusions appear to be interrelated. Finally, a possible '
educational road' from this proto-thermodynamic students' context to a
'genuine' thermodynamic context is suggested.