PREDICTING THE DISTRIBUTION OF ORGANISMS AMONG A FEW PATCHES - PROBLEMS WITH DETECTING DEPARTURES FROM THE IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION

Citation
Rv. Cartar et Mv. Abrahams, PREDICTING THE DISTRIBUTION OF ORGANISMS AMONG A FEW PATCHES - PROBLEMS WITH DETECTING DEPARTURES FROM THE IDEAL FREE DISTRIBUTION, Oikos, 78(2), 1997, pp. 388-393
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Zoology,Ecology
Journal title
OikosACNP
ISSN journal
00301299
Volume
78
Issue
2
Year of publication
1997
Pages
388 - 393
Database
ISI
SICI code
0030-1299(1997)78:2<388:PTDOOA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Much empirical work has examined whether foraging animals distribute t hemselves across patches of resources according to an ideal free distr ibution (IFD). Most studies consider situations with 2 patches, where choice of one patch is synonymous,vith rejection of the alternative. I n this paper, we use computer simulations to determine the effect of t he number of patches on achievement of an IFD, Identical foragers were allowed to move between patches so as to maximize their intake rate. To generate departures from an IFD, we assigned all foragers a percept ion Limit of prey numbers such that they could not perceive difference s in patch quality that exceed this limit. Foragers would choose rando mly from the patches among which they could perceive no differences. W e found that, for the same perception limit, departures from an IFD we re greatest in the 2-patch situation. In addition, we are less likely to detect perception limit-generated deviations from an IFD (or even a random distribution) in greater than 2-patch situations unless He exa mine cases in which there are large among-patch differences in quality . Hence, lab and field studies that incorporate the greater realism ac hieved by using more than 2 patches must be cautious about falsely acc epting the hypothesis of an IFD, particularly if the causes of deviati ons from an IFD are independent of the number of patches. We review pu blished studies and find that conformity to an IFD seems to decrease w ith an increase in the number of patches. Hence, if deviations from an IFD are perception-induced, discrimination may decrease with the numb er of patches, presumably because of the increasing physical and compu tational difficulties of keeping track of each patch.